Philosophical View on Fulfilling Community Economic Needs Through Non-Timber Forest Products in the Context of Community Forest Management

Authors

  • M. Kudsi Rosadi Resources and Environmental Management Study Program, University of Mataram Author
  • Muhammad Sarjan Resources and Environmental Management Study Program, University of Mataram Author

DOI:

https://doi.org/10.71024/ecobios.2026.v3i1.78

Keywords:

Non-timber forest products, Community forest, Environmental philosophy, Sustainable forest management, Community participation

Abstract

Non-timber forest products (NTFPs) play a crucial role in supporting rural livelihoods while contributing to the sustainable management of community forests. However, the utilization of NTFPs is often predominantly viewed from an economic perspective, with limited consideration of environmental ethics and ecological sustainability. Integrating anthropocentric, ecocentric, and biocentric perspectives provides a more comprehensive framework for understanding the balance between community welfare and forest conservation. This study aims to analyze the practices of utilizing NTFPs to meet community economic needs, examine the relationship between NTFP utilization, forest ecosystem sustainability, and community participation, and explore these practices through the perspectives of environmental philosophy. The research employed a qualitative descriptive approach using a case study design in community forest areas. Data were collected through field observations, semi-structured interviews with community members, community forest managers, and local stakeholders, as well as documentation studies. The collected data were analyzed using an interactive qualitative analysis model involving data reduction, data display, and conclusion drawing. The findings indicate that NTFPs significantly contribute to household income diversification while encouraging active community participation in sustainable forest management. Traditional ecological knowledge and local institutions strengthen conservation practices and promote responsible resource utilization. From an environmental philosophy perspective, NTFP management reflects a dynamic interaction among anthropocentric, ecocentric, and biocentric values, demonstrating that economic benefits can be harmonized with ecological integrity and ethical responsibility. These findings highlight the importance of integrating environmental ethics into community forest management policies to achieve socially equitable, economically viable, and ecologically sustainable development.

Downloads

Download data is not yet available.

References

Annisa, N., Putri, A. R., & Salampessy, M. L. (2024). Kearifan lokal sasi ikan lompa masyarakat Desa Haruku dalam menjaga kelestarian ekosistem laut: Studi literatur. South East and East Sustainable Development Goals Journal, 1(1), 1–10.

Asamoah, O., Danquah, J. A., Bamwesigye, D., Boakye, E. A., Appiah, M., & Pappinen, A. (2024). Perception of locals on multiple contributions of NTFPs to the livelihoods of forest fringe communities in Ghana. Forests, 15(5), 861. https://doi.org/10.3390/f15050861

de Mello, N. G. R., Gulinck, H., Van den Broeck, P., & Parra, C. (2020). Social-ecological sustainability of non-timber forest products: A review and theoretical considerations for future research. Forest Policy and Economics, 112, 102109. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.forpol.2020.102109

Derebe, B., & Alemu, A. (2023). Non-timber forest product types and its income contribution to rural households in the Horn of Africa: a systematic review. Forest Science and Technology, 19(3), 210-220. https://doi.org/10.1080/21580103.2023.2231963

Desyanti, D. (2023). Pemanfaatan hasil hutan bukan kayu dan kontribusinya terhadap ekonomi masyarakat di sekitar Hutan Desa Nagari Pondok Parian Kecamatan Lunang Kabupaten Pesisir Selatan Provinsi Sumatera Barat. Menara Ilmu: Jurnal Penelitian dan Kajian Ilmiah, 17(2), 84–93.

Food and Agriculture Organization. (2022). The state of the world's forests 2022: Forest pathways for green recovery and building inclusive, resilient and sustainable economies. FAO. https://doi.org/10.4060/cb9360en

Madsen, P. (2023). Deep ecology. Encyclopedia Britannica.

Makkarennu, M., Ridwan, R., & Lobo, E. E. (2025). Non-timber forest products and their contributions to the livelihood of the forest community. AIP Conference Proceedings, 3172(1), 020048. https://doi.org/10.1063/5.0241157

Muliyani, I., Kartika, A. N., Mely, P., & Prasetiyo, T. (2024). Pengelolaan berbasis kearifan lokal dalam menjaga keberlanjutan hutan adat Kalimantan. Prosiding Seminar Sosial, Politik, Bisnis, Akuntansi dan Teknik, 6, 1–12.

Naess, A. (1973). The shallow and the deep, long-range ecology movement: A summary. Inquiry, 16(1–4), 95–100. https://doi.org/10.1080/00201747308601682

Naess, A. (1989). Ecology, community and lifestyle: Outline of an ecosophy (D. Rothenberg, Trans.). Cambridge University Press. https://doi.org/10.1017/CBO9780511525599

Naniko, B. N., & Saharuddin. (2023). Perilaku masyarakat adat terhadap kearifan lokal dalam pengelolaan sumber daya alam (Kasus: Masyarakat adat Baduy). Jurnal Sains Komunikasi dan Pengembangan Masyarakat, 7(1), 1–15.

Pasaribu, G., Winarni, I., Gusti, R. E. P., Maharani, R., Fernandes, A., Harianja, A. H., Saragih, G. S., Turjaman, M., Tampubolon, A. P., Kuspradini, H., Lukmandaru, G., Njurumana, G. N., Sukito, A., Asmaliyah, A., & Krisnawati, R. (2021). Current challenges and prospects of Indonesian non-timber forest products (NTFPs): A review. Forests, 12(12), 1743. https://doi.org/10.3390/f12121743

Peerzada, I. A., Islam, M. A., Chamberlain, J., Dhyani, S., Reddy, M., & Saha, S. (2022). Potential of NTFP based bioeconomy in livelihood security and income inequality mitigation in Kashmir Himalayas. Sustainability, 14(4), 2281. https://doi.org/10.3390/su14042281

Rachmina, D., Fariyanti, A., Rifin, A., & Burhanuddin. (2024). Business sustainability analysis of the social forestry program in West Sumatra Province. AGRARIS: Journal of Agribusiness and Rural Development Research, 10(1), 1–15.

Rahman, M. H., Roy, B., & Islam, M. S. (2021). Contribution of non-timber forest products to the livelihoods of the forest-dependent communities around the Khadimnagar National Park in northeastern Bangladesh. Regional Sustainability, 2(3), 280–295. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.regsus.2021.11.001

Sari, C. P., Supriyadi, Purwanto, Rosariastuti, R., & Nufus, M. (2025). Sumberejo community's perspective on non-timber forest products to support sustainable environment. Bioexperiments: Journal of Biological Research, 11(2), 139–151. https://doi.org/10.23917/bioeksperimen.v11i2.13643

Shackleton, C. M., & de Vos, A. (2022). How many people globally actually use non-timber forest products? Forest Policy and Economics, 135, 102659. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.forpol.2021.102659

Shackleton, C. M., Garekae, H., Sardeshpande, M., et al.et al., (2024). Non-timber forest products as poverty traps: Fact or fiction? Forest Policy and Economics, 158, 103114. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.forpol.2023.103114

Sheppard, J. P., Chamberlain, J., Agúndez, D., Bhattacharya, P., Chirwa, P. W., Gontcharov, A., ... & Mutke, S. (2020). Sustainable forest management beyond the timber-oriented status quo: transitioning to co-production of timber and non-wood forest products—a global perspective. Current Forestry Reports, 6(1), 26-40. https://doi.org/10.1007/s40725-019-00107-1

Downloads

Published

2026-06-29

How to Cite

Philosophical View on Fulfilling Community Economic Needs Through Non-Timber Forest Products in the Context of Community Forest Management. (2026). Ecobios Journal of Environmental Science, 3(1), 10-16. https://doi.org/10.71024/ecobios.2026.v3i1.78

Most read articles by the same author(s)

1 2 3 > >>